This makes sense: UCLA

What's Hot Right Now How Men Can Better Recognize and Interrupt Everyday Sexual Harassment 17 Lies We Need to Stop Teaching Girls About Sex White Privilege, Explained in One Simple associated distributors Comic Why Era-Themed Parties Can Be Awkward for People of Color
This is called concern trolling, and it needs to stop . The intersectional issues of size, health and weight loss are far more complicated associated distributors than we’ve been led to believe, and this lack of understanding has led to weight-based discrimination becoming a serious problem across the world.
People are allowed to make their own decisions regarding their own bodies, but we need to start treating people of all sizes with respect . We can start by providing some actual information about being fat. 1. BMI is BS.
“Muscle weighs associated distributors more than fat.” It’s the adage of body-builders everywhere, and, though technically associated distributors we should say muscle is denser than fat, its message associated distributors bears repeating: Muscle mass can have a big impact on weight.
They do, however, draw arbitrarily sharp divisions between what’s considered normal, overweight and obese, even though individuals with a lot of lean muscle and little fat could fall into any of these categories. (On the flip side, those with a low BMI may have very little muscle and a high percentage of body fat, despite landing in the “healthy” range.)
Contrary to popular opinion, BMI is not an indicator of fitness . Its inventor, 19th century Belgian mathematician Adolphe Quetelet, intended his formula to be used to assess the status of general populations so the government could better allocate resources not to calculate how much excess fat individuals associated distributors have.
Nevertheless, many doctors and medical insurers continue to rely on BMI (deemed by NPR a “200-year-old numerical associated distributors hack developed by a mathematician who was not even an expert in what little was known about the human body back then”) as an authoritative marker of health.
While perhaps useful as a broad strokes guide to determining where someone’s body falls in relation to others’ of similar height, it’s important to remember that the picture BMI paints isn’t nearly complete. 2. Fat people don’t all have poor eating and exercise habits.
It’s entirely possible for a naturally thin person to be a couch potato and for a heavier associated distributors person to run five miles a day and have a soft spot for kale, because all bodies look different (which is pretty cool , by the way), and because the relationship between health and weight is complex.
Factors like age, genetics, underlying conditions and dieting history all contribute to that number we see on the scale, and you can never tell exactly what someone’s eating and exercise habits are just by looking at them .
What’s more, making an assumption about someone’s diet whether it’s that a fat person eats poorly or that a skinny person doesn’t eat at all can be triggering for those who actually do have issues with food . That’s not helping anyone.
One’s relationship to food shouldn’t reflect on who they are as a human being, and destroying someone’s self-esteem in the name of “health” is never going to work (see No. 6). 3. Fat itself isn’t unhealthy.
If being fat were inherently bad for us, then weight loss should bring about innumerable health benefits. But that’s not always the case: Multiple studies have seen little to no connection between weight loss and decreased risk of mortality. associated distributors
Extremes on either end of the scale carry risks, and no one doubts that eating a balanced diet and getting regular exercise are good things. On its own, however, weight is not the issue . Too much junk food combined with a sedentary lifestyle is, and it’s going to be regardless of one’s weight. 4. Being fat doesn’t signify a lack of willpower.
The rise in the number of people considered overweight associated distributors cannot be written off as an individual lack of conviction. Indeed, International Journal of Obesity editor Richard L. Atkinson wrote in 2005 that the belief that “obesity is simply the result of a lack of willpower and an inability to discipline eating associated distributors habits is no longer defensible.”
As neuroscientist Sandra Aamodt points out in her recent TEDTalk , individuals have unique weight “set points.” Losing weight outside associated distributors of this range is really, really hard, and to chalk up the failure to do so to willpower is both disrespectful and ignorant.
This makes sense: UCLA’s A. Janet Tomiyama told the university that if “dieting worked, it wouldn’t be a $60 billion-dollar industry,” and that our genes’ power over our weight “is about the same” as their power over our height.
The truth is that we still don’t know exactly how to healthfully lose weight and keep it o